For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
Dablander, F., Huth, K., Gronau, Q. F., Etz, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2022). A puzzle of proportions: Two popular Bayesian tests can yield dramatically different conclusions. Statistics in Medicine, 41(8), 1319-1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9278[details]
Forscher, P. S., Wagenmakers, E. J., Coles, N. A., Silan, M. A., Dutra, N., Basnight-Brown, D., & IJzerman, H. (2022). The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221082970
Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., Bartoš, F., Beitner, J., De Ron, J., Gligoric, V., Kleinberg, B., Van der Cruyssen, I., van Dongen, N. N. N., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Verschuere, B., Wiechert, S., Zarzeczna, N., van Elk, M., Wagenmakers, E-J., & The MARP Team (2022). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070255
Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2022). Many-analysts religion project:reflection and conclusion. Religion, Brain and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070263
Ly, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2022). Measure-Theoretic Musings Cannot Salvage the Full Bayesian Significance Test as a Measure of Evidence. Computational Brain and Behavior, 5(4), 583-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00154-1[details]
Manning, C., Hassall, C. D., Hunt, L. T., Norcia, A. M., Wagenmakers, E-J., Evans, N. J., & Scerif, G. (2022). Behavioural and neural indices of perceptual decision-making in autistic children during visual motion tasks. Scientific Reports, 12, [6072]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09885-4[details]
Manning, C., Hassall, C. D., Hunt, L. T., Norcia, A. M., Wagenmakers, E-J., Snowling, M. J., Scerif, G., & Evans, N. J. (2022). Visual Motion and Decision-Making in Dyslexia: Reduced Accumulation of Sensory Evidence and Related Neural Dynamics. The Journal of Neuroscience, 42(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1232-21.2021[details]
Mulder, J., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Marsman, M. (2022). A Generalization of the Savage–Dickey Density Ratio for Testing Equality and Order Constrained Hypotheses. American Statistician, 76(2), 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2020.1799861[details]
Pfadt, J. M., Bergh, D. V. D., Sijtsma, K., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2022). A tutorial on Bayesian single-test reliability analysis with JASP. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01778-0
Pfadt, J. M., van den Bergh, D., Sijtsma, K., Moshagen, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2022). Bayesian Estimation of Single-Test Reliability Coefficients. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 57(4), 620-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2021.1891855[details]
Rosenberg, J. M., Kubsch, M., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Dogucu, M. (2022). Making Sense of Uncertainty in the Science Classroom: A Bayesian Approach. Science and Education, 31(5), 1239-1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00341-3[details]
Sarafoglou, A., Kovacs, M., Bakos, B., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Aczel, B. (2022). A survey on how preregistration affects the research workflow: better science but more work. Royal Society Open Science, 9(7), [211997]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211997[details]
Sarafoglou, A., van der Heijden, A., Draws, T., Cornelisse, J., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Marsman, M. (2022). Combine Statistical Thinking With Open Scientific Practice: A Protocol of a Bayesian Research Project. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 21(2), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221077307[details]
Stefan, A. M., Katsimpokis, D., Gronau, Q. F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2022). Expert agreement in prior elicitation and its effects on Bayesian inference. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 29(5), 1776-1794. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02074-4[details]
Stefan, A. M., Lengersdorff, L. L., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2022). A Two-Stage Bayesian Sequential Assessment of Exploratory Hypotheses. Collabra: Psychology, 8, [40350]. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.40350[details]
Temp, A. G. M., Ly, A., van Doorn, J., Wagenmakers, E-J., Tang, Y., Lutz, M. W., & Teipel, S. (2022). A Bayesian perspective on Biogen's aducanumab trial. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 18(11), 2341-2351. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12615[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2022). Advantages masquerading as "issues" in Bayesian hypothesis testing: A commentary on Tendeiro and Kiers (2019). Psychological Methods, 27(3), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000415
2021
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., van den Akker, O. R., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A., Bastiaansen, J. A., Benjamin, D., Boehm, U., Botvinik-Nezer, R., Bringmann, L. F., Busch, N. A., Caruyer, E., Cataldo, A. M., Cowan, N., Delios, A., van Dongen, N. N. N., Donkin, C., van Doorn, J. B., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2021). Science Forum: Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies. eLife, 10, [e72185]. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72185
Derks, K., de Swart, J., van Batenburg, P., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Wetzels, R. (2021). Priors in a Bayesian audit: How integration of existing information into the prior distribution can improve audit transparency and efficiency. International Journal of Auditing, 25(3), 621-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12240[details]
Gronau, Q. F., Heck, D. W., Berkhout, S. W., Haaf, J. M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2021). A Primer on Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211031256[details]
Gronau, Q. F., Raj, A. K. N., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2021). Informed Bayesian Inference for the A/B Test. Journal of Statistical Software, 100(17). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v100.i17[details]
Hulme, O. J., Wagenmakers, E. J., Damkier, P., Madelung, C. F., Siebner, H. R., Helweg-Larsen, J., Gronau, Q. F., Benfield, T. L., & Madsen, K. H. (2021). A Bayesian reanalysis of the effects of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on viral carriage in patients with COVID-19. PLoS ONE, 16(2), [e0245048]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245048[details]
Linde, M., Tendeiro, J. N., Selker, R., Wagenmakers, E-J., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2021). Decisions about equivalence: A comparison of TOST, HDI-ROPE, and the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000402
Mulder, J., Williams, D. R., Gu, X., Tomarken, A., Böing-Messing, F., Olsson-Collentine, A., Meijerink, M., Menke, J., van Aert, R., Fox, J-P., Hoijtink, H., Rosseel, Y., Wagenmakers, E-J., & van Lissa, C. (2021). BFpack: Flexible Bayes Factor Testing of Scientific Theories in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 100(18). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v100.i18[details]
Sarafoglou, A., Haaf, J. M., Ly, A., Gronau, Q. F., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Marsman, M. (2021). Evaluating Multinomial Order Restrictions With Bridge Sampling. Psychological Methods, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000411
Steingröver, H., Wabersich, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2021). Modeling Across-Trial Variability in the Wald Drift Rate Parameter. Behavior Research Methods, 53(3), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01448-7[details]
Temp, A. G. M., Lutz, M. W., Trepel, D., Tang, Y., Wagenmakers, E. J., Khachaturian, A. S., & Teipel, S. (2021). How Bayesian statistics may help answer some of the controversial questions in clinical research on Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 17(6), 917-919. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12374[details]
Vohs, K. D., Schmeichel, B. J., Lohmann, S., Gronau, Q. F., Finley, A. J., Ainsworth, S., Alquist, J. L., Baker, M. D., Brizi, A., Bunyi, A., Butschek, G. J., Campbell, C., Capaldi, J., Cau, C., Chambers, H., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Christensen, W. J., Clay, S. L., Curtis, J., ... Albarracín, D. (2021). A multisite preregistered paradigmatic test of the ego-depletion effect. Psychological Science, 32(10), 1566-1581. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e497p, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797621989733
Wagenmakers, E-J., Sarafoglou, A., Aarts, S., Albers, C., Algermissen, J., Bahník, Š., van Dongen, N., Hoekstra, R., Moreau, D., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Sluga, A., Stanke, F., Tendeiro, J., & Aczel, B. (2021). Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practice. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11), 1473-1480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01211-8[details]
Wagenmakers, E. M., Derks, K. P., de Swart, J., Wetzels, R. M., & Wille, J. (2021). JASP for Audit: Bayesian Tools for the Auditing Practice. The Journal of Open Source Software, 6(68), 1-2. [2733]. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02733
van Doorn, J., Aust, F., Haaf, J. M., Stefan, A. M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2021). Bayes Factors for Mixed Models. Computational Brain and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-021-00113-2
van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Haaf, J. M., Hinne, M., Kucharský, Š., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Komarlu Narendra Gupta, A. R., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2021). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5[details]
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., Chambers, C. D., Fisher, A., Gelman, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., Ioannidis, J. P., Johnson, E., Jonas, K., Kousta, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., Lindsay, D. S., Morey, C. C., Munafò, M., Newell, B. R., ... Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). Author Correction: A consensus-based transparency checklist (Nature human behaviour (2020) 4 1 (4-6)). Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0812-2
Boehm, U., van Maanen, L., Evans, N. J., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). A theoretical analysis of the reward rate optimality of collapsing decision criteria. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 82(3), 1520-1534. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01806-4[details]
Dablander, F., van den Bergh, D., Ly, A., & Wagenmakers, E. M. (2020). Default Bayes Factors for Testing the (In)equality of Several Population Variances. Manuscript submitted for publication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06278
Dahrendorf, M., Hoffmann, T., Mittenbühler, M., Wiechert, S., Sarafoglou, A., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). "Because it is the Right Thing to Do'': Taking Stock of the Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative. Journal of European Psychology Students, 11(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h39jt, https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.506[details]
Evans, N. J., Dutilh, G., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Maas, H. L. J. V. D. (2020). Double responding: A new constraint for models of speeded decision making. Cognitive Psychology, 121, [101292]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101292[details]
Faulkenberry, T. J., Ly, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Bayesian Inference in Numerical Cognition: A Tutorial Using JASP. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 6(2), 231-259. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v6i2.288[details]
Field, S. M., Wagenmakers, E-J., Kiers, H. A. L., Hoekstra, R., Ernst, A. F., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered report. Royal Society Open Science, 7(4), [181351]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181351[details]
Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Laypeople Can Predict Which Social-Science Studies Will Be Replicated Successfully. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(3), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920919667[details]
Landy, J. F., Jia, M. L., Ding, I. L., Viganola, D., Tierney, W., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Ebersole, C. R., Gronau, Q. F., Ly, A., van den Bergh, D., Marsman, M., Derks, K., Wagenmakers, E-J., Proctor, A., Bartels, D. M., Bauman, C. W., Brady, W. J., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. Psychological Bulletin, 146(5), 451-479. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000220[details]
Ly, A., Stefan, A., van Doorn, J., Dablander, F., van den Bergh, D., Sarafoglou, A., Kucharský, S., Derks, K., Gronau, Q. F., Raj, A., Boehm, U., van Kesteren, E-J., Hinne, M., Matzke, D., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). The Bayesian Methodology of Sir Harold Jeffreys as a Practical Alternative to the P Value Hypothesis Test. Computational Brain & Behavior, 3(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dhb7x, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-019-00070-x[details]
Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Teaching Good Research Practices: Protocol of a Research Master Course. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719858807[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2020). The Principle of Predictive Irrelevance, or Why Intervals Should Not be Used for Model Comparison Featuring a Point Null Hypothesis. In C. W. Gruber (Ed.), The Theory of Statistics in Psychology: Applications, Use and Misunderstandings (pp. 111-129). (Annals of Theoretical Psychology; Vol. 16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rqnu5, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48043-1_8[details]
van Doorn, J., Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Bayesian rank-based hypothesis testing for the rank sum test, the signed rank test, and Spearman’s ρ. Journal of Applied Statistics, 47(16), 2984-3006. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1709053[details]
van Doorn, J., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). An In-Class Demonstration of Bayesian Inference. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719848574[details]
van den Bergh, D., Bogaerts, S., Spreen, M., Flohr, R., Vandekerckhove, J., Batchelder, W. H., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Cultural Consensus Theory for the evaluation of patients’ mental health scores in forensic psychiatric hospitals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 98, [102383]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102383[details]
van den Bergh, D., van Doorn, J., Marsman, M., Draws, T., van Kesteren, E-J., Derks, K., Dablander, F., Gronau, Q. F., Kucharský, Š., Komarlu Narendra Gupta, A. R., Sarafoglou, A., Voelkel, J. G., Stefan, A., Ly, A., Hinne, M., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP. Année Psychologique, 120(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/spreb, https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy1.201.0073[details]
2019
Evans, N. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Theoretically meaningful models can answer clinically relevant questions. Brain, 142(5), 1172-1175. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz073[details]
Gronau, Q. F., Wagenmakers, E-J., Heck, D. W., & Matzke, D. (2019). A simple method for comparing complex models: Bayesian model comparison for hierarchical multinomial processing tree models using Warp-III bridge sampling. Psychometrika, 84(1), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-018-9648-3[details]
Heck, D. W., Overstall, A. M., Gronau, Q. F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Quantifying uncertainty in transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo using discrete Markov models. Statistics and Computing, 29(4), 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-018-9828-0[details]
Ly, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2498–2508. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1092-x[details]
Selker, R., van den Bergh, D., Criss, A. H., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Parsimonious estimation of signal detection models from confidence ratings. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 1953-1967. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01231-3[details]
Stefan, A. M., Gronau, Q. F., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). A tutorial on Bayes Factor Design Analysis using an informed prior. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1042-1058. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01189-8[details]
van Dongen, N. N. N., van Doorn, J. B., Gronau, Q. F., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Hoekstra, R., Haucke, M. N., Lakens, D., Hennig, C., Morey, R. D., Homer, S., Gelman, A., Sprenger, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2019). Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenarios. American Statistician, 73(S1), 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1565553[details]
van Doorn, J., Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Bayesian estimation of Kendall’s τ using a latent normal approach. Statistics and Probability Letters, 145, 268-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2018.10.004[details]
Aczel, B., Palfi, B., Szollosi, A., Kovacs, M., Szaszi, B., Szecsi, P., Zrubka, M., Gronau, Q. F., van den Bergh, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Quantifying Support for the Null Hypothesis in Psychology: An Empirical Investigation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918773742[details]
Beek, T. F., Matzke, D., Pinto, Y., Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Sasiadek, A., Steingroever, H., Jostmann, N. B., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Incidental Haptic Sensations May Not Influence Social Judgments: A Purely Confirmatory Replication Attempt of Study 1 by Ackerman, Nocera, and Bargh (2010). Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 14(2), 69-90. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=132351143&site=ehost-live&scope=site[details]
Boehm, U., Annis, J., Frank, M. J., Hawkins, G. E., Heathcote, A., Kellen, D., Krypotos, A-M., Lerche, V., Logan, G. D., Palmeri, T. J., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Servant, M., Singmann, H., Starns, J. J., Voss, A., Wiecki, T. V., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Estimating across-trial variability parameters of the Diffusion Decision Model: Expert advice and recommendations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 87, 46-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.09.004[details]
Boehm, U., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1614-1631. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1054-3[details]
Boehm, U., Steingroever, H., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Using Bayesian regression to test hypotheses about relationships between parameters and covariates in cognitive models. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1248–1269. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0940-4[details]
Camerer, C., Dreber Almenberg, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., ... Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z[details]
Derks, K., Burger, J., van Doorn, J., Kossakowski, J. J., Matzke, D., Atticciati, L., Beitner, J., Benzesin, V., de Bruijn, A. L., Cohen, T. R. H., Cordesius, E. P. A., van Dekken, M., Delvendahl, N., Dobbelaar, S., Groenendijk, E. R., Hermans, M. E., Hiekkaranta, A. P., Hoekstra, R. H. A., Hoffmann, A. M., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Network Models to Organize a Dispersed Literature: The Case of Misunderstanding Analysis of Covariance. Journal of European Psychology Students, 9, 48-57. https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.458[details]
Ernst, A. F., Hoekstra, R., Wagenmakers, E. J., Gelman, A., & Van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2018). Do Researchers Anchor Their Beliefs on the Outcome of an Initial Study? Testing the Time-Reversal Heuristic. Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000402
Gronau, Q. F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayesian Evidence Accumulation in Experimental Mathematics: A Case Study of Four Irrational Numbers. Experimental Mathematics, 27(3), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2016.1256006[details]
Hoekstra, R., Monden, R., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayesian reanalysis of null results reported in medicine Strong yet variable evidence for the absence of treatment effects. PLoS ONE, 13(4), [e0195474]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195474[details]
Hoogeveen, S., Wagenmakers, E-J., Kay, A. C., & Van Elk, M. (2018). Compensatory control and religious beliefs: A registered replication report across two countries. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(3), 240-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2019.1684821[details]
Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886[details]
Hu, C-P., Kong, X-Z., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ly, A., & Peng, K. (2018). The Bayes factor and its implementation in JASP: A practical primer. Xinli kexue jinzhan, 26(6), 951–965. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00951[details]
Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Analytic posteriors for Pearson's correlation coefficient. Statistica Neerlandica, 72(1), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12111[details]
Ly, A., Raj, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., Gronau, Q. F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayesian reanalyses from summary statistics: A guide for academic consumers. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 367-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918779348[details]
Meindertsma, T., Kloosterman, N. A., Engel, A. K., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Donner, T. H. (2018). Surprise About Sensory Event Timing Drives Cortical Transients in the Beta Frequency Band. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(35), 7600-7610. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0307-18.2018[details]
Monden, R., Roest, A. M., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Morey, R., Wardenaar, K. J., & de Jonge, P. (2018). The comparative evidence basis for the efficacy of second-generation antidepressants in the treatment of depression in the US: A Bayesian meta-analysis of Food and Drug Administration reviews. Journal of Affective Disorders, 235, 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.040[details]
de Jonge, P., Morey, R., Roest, A. M., Wardenaar, K. J., Monden, R., Wagenmakers, E.-J. & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (1-8-2018). Data for: The comparative evidence basis for the efficacy of second-generation antidepressants in the treatment of depression: A Bayesian Meta-analysis. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/p3k5h38xpn.1
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(1), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y[details]
Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., Carlsson, R., Cheung, F., Christensen, G., Clay, R., Craig, M. A., Rosa, A. D., Dam, L., Evans, M. H., Cervantes, I. F., ... Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many analysts, one data set: Making transparent how variations in analytic choices affect results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). In Vivo: Likelihood: A halfway house? In S. Farrell, & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Computational Modeling of Cognition and Behaviour (pp. 103-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316272503.005[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Dutilh, G., & Sarafoglou, A. (2018). The Creativity-Verification Cycle in Psychological Science: New Methods to Combat Old Idols. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618771357[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E-J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., ... Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35-57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3[details]
van Doorn, J., Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Bayesian Inference for Kendall's Rank Correlation Coefficient. American Statistician, 72(4), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1264998[details]
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Ly, A., Matzke, D., Pedroni, A., Frey, R., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). A test of the diffusion model explanation for the worst performance rule using preregistration and blinding. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 79(3), 713-725. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1304-y[details]
Etz, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). J. B. S. Haldane's contribution to the bayes factor hypothesis test. Statistical Science, 32(2), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-STS599[details]
Evans, N. J., Hawkins, G. E., Boehm, U., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Brown, S. D. (2017). The computations that support simple decision-making: A comparison between the diffusion and urgency-gating models. Scientific Reports, 7, [16433]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16694-7[details]
Forstmeier, W., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Parker, T. H. (2017). Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings: A practical guide. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 92(4), 1941–1968. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12315[details]
Gronau, Q. F., Duizer, M., Bakker, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Bayesian mixture modeling of significant p values: A meta-analytic method to estimate the degree of contamination from H0. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 146(9), 1223-1233. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000324[details]
Gronau, Q. F., Sarafoglou, A., Matzke, D., Ly, A., Boehm, U., Marsman, M., Leslie, D. S., Forster, J. J., Wagenmakers, E-M., & Steingroever, H. (2017). A tutorial on bridge sampling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 81, 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.005[details]
Gronau, Q. F., Van Erp, S., Heck, D. W., Cesario, J., Jonas, K. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: the case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760[details]
Jamil, T., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., Love, J., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Default “Gunel and Dickey” Bayes factors for contingency tables. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 638-652. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0739-8[details]
Jamil, T., Marsman, M., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). What Are the Odds? Modern Relevance and Bayes Factor Solutions for MacAlister’s Problem From the 1881 Educational Times. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(5), 819-830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416667980[details]
Ly, A., Marsman, M., Verhagen, J., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E-M. (2017). A tutorial on Fisher information. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 80, 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2017.05.006[details]
Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Three insights from a Bayesian interpretation of the one-sided P value. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(3), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416669201[details]
Matzke, D., Ly, A., Selker, R., Weeda, W. D., Scheibehenne, B., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Bayesian inference for correlations in the presence of measurement error and estimation uncertainty. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), [25]. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.78[details]
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie Du Sert, N., ... Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), [0021]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021[details]
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, J., Swagman, A. R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2017). Bayesian analysis of factorial designs. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 304-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000057[details]
Scheibehenne, B., Gronau, Q. F., Jamil, T., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Fixed or Random? A Resolution Through Model Averaging: Reply to Carlsson, Schimmack, Williams, and Bürkner (2017). Psychological Science, 28(11), 1698-1701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617724426[details]
Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential Hypothesis Testing With Bayes Factors: Efficiently Testing Mean Differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Verhagen, J., Ly, A., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2017). The need for Bayesian hypothesis testing in psychological science. In S. O. Lilienfeld, & I. D. Waldman (Eds.), Psychological Science under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions (pp. 123-138). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119095910.ch8[details]
van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Can the experimental study of religion be advanced using a Bayesian predictive framework? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 331-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249915[details]
van Erp, S., Verhagen, J., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2017). Estimates of Between-Study Heterogeneity for 705 Meta-Analyses Reported in Psychological Bulletin From 1990–2013. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 5(1), [4]. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.33[details]
Boehm, U., Hawkins, G. E., Brown, S., van Rijn, H., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Of monkeys and men: Impatience in perceptual decision-making. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 738-749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0958-5[details]
Boekel, W., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Challenges in replicating brain-behavior correlations: Rejoinder to Kanai (2015) and Muhlert and Ridgway (2015). Cortex, 74, 348-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.018[details]
Cramer, A. O. J., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Waldorp, L. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 640-647. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0913-5[details]
Field, S. M., Wagenmakers, E-J., Newell, B. R., Zeelenberg, R., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2016). Two Bayesian tests of the GLOMOsys model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 145(12), e81-e95. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000067[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645[details]
Heck, D. W., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Adjusted priors for Bayes factors involving reparameterized order constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 73, 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.05.004[details]
Ly, A., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). An evaluation of alternative methods for testing hypotheses, from the perspective of Harold Jeffreys. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.003[details]
Ly, A., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Harold Jeffreys’s default Bayes factor hypothesis tests: Explanation, extension, and application in psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.06.004[details]
Monden, R., de Vos, S., Morey, R., Wagenmakers, E-J., de Jonge, P., & Roest, A. M. (2016). Toward evidence-based medical statistics: A Bayesian analysis of double-blind placebo-controlled antidepressant trials in the treatment of anxiety disorders. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 25(4), 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1507[details]
Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., ... Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), [150547]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547[details]
Morey, R. D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J. N., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8[details]
Morey, R. D., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Rouder, J. N. (2016). Calibrated Bayes Factors Should Not Be Used: A Reply to Hoijtink, van Kooten, and Hulsker. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1052710[details]
Mulder, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Editors’ introduction to the special issue “Bayes factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research: Practical relevance and new developments”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.002[details]
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). The interplay between subjectivity, statistical practice, and psychological science. Collabra, 2, [6]. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.28[details]
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, J., Province, J. M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Is there a free lunch in inference? Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(3), 520-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12214[details]
Scheibehenne, B., Jamil, T., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2016). Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Can Reconcile Seemingly Inconsistent Results: The Case of Hotel Towel Reuse. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1043-1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644081[details]
Schweinsberg, M., Madan, N., Vianello, M., Sommer, S. A., Jordan, J., Tierney, W., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2016). The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Bayes factors for reinforcement-learning models of the Iowa Gambling Task. Decision, 3(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000040[details]
Tierney, W., Schweinsberg, M., Jordan, J., Kennedy, D. M., Qureshi, I., Sommer, S. A., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2016). Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects. Scientific Data, 3, [160082]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.82[details]
Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). C. S. Peirce on the Crisis of Confidence and the “No More Bets” Heuristic. The Winnower, 3, [e146611.14253]. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.146611.14253[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., & Busato, V. (2016). De verleidingen van foponderzoek. Skepter, 29(4), 24-28. [details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Beek, T., Dijkhoff, L., Gronau, Q. F., Acosta, A., Adams, R. B., Albohn, D. N., Allard, E. S., Benning, S. D., Blouin-Hudon, E-M., Bulnes, L. C., Caldwell, T. L., Calin-Jageman, R. J., Capaldi, C. A., Carfagno, N. S., Chasten, K. T., Cleeremans, A., Connell, L., DeCicco, J. M., ... Zwaan, R. A. (2016). Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616674458[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Morey, R. D., & Lee, M. D. (2016). Bayesian Benefits for the Pragmatic Researcher. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416643289[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Verhagen, J., & Ly, A. (2016). How to quantify the evidence for the absence of a correlation. Behavior Research Methods, 48(2), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0593-0[details]
Wetzels, R., Tutschkow, D., Dolan, C., van der Sluis, S., Dutilh, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). A Bayesian test for the hot hand phenomenon. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.12.003[details]
van Maanen, L., Forstmann, B. U., Keuken, M. C., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Heathcote, A. (2016). The impact of MRI scanner environment on perceptual decision-making. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0563-6[details]
Aarts, A. A., et al., U., Borsboom, D., Columbus, S., den Bezemer, B., Deserno, M. K., Epskamp, S., Jonas, K., Kleinberg, B., Kossakowski, J. J., Kunkels, Y. K., Rahal, R-M., Sahin, O., Skorinko, J. L. M., Tio, P., van Bork, R., van den Bergh, D., van Renswoude, D. R., van Doorn, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 943. [aac4716]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716[details]
Tio, P., Renkewitz, F., Bell, R., Selterman, D., Thomas, S. L., Martinez, T., Voracek, M., Van Doorn, J., Ostkamp, L., Galak, J., Pipitone, R. ., Epskamp, S., Hodsoll, J., Axt, J., Van Rijn, H., Bartmess, E., Strohminger, N., Beyan, L., Hung, C. O.-Y., … Scholz, S. (1-1-2015). Data from: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Singapore Management University. https://doi.org/10.25440/smu.12062757.v1
Andraszewicz, S., Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, J., Grasman, R., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). An introduction to Bayesian hypothesis testing for management research. Journal of Management, 41(2), 521-543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314560412[details]
Boekel, W., Wagenmakers, E-J., Belay, L., Verhagen, J., Brown, S., & Forstmann, B. U. (2015). A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations. Cortex, 66, 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.11.019[details]
Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Model-based cognitive neuroscience: a conceptual introduction. In B. U. Forstmann, & E-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience (pp. 139-156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_7[details]
Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Preface. In B. U. Forstmann, & E-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience (pp. v-vi). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9[details]
Hawkins, G. E., Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ratcliff, R., & Brown, S. D. (2015). Revisiting the evidence of collapsing boundaries and urgency signals in perceptual decision-making. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(6), 2476-2484. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2410-14.2015[details]
Hawkins, G. E., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ratcliff, R., & Brown, S. D. (2015). Discriminating evidence accumulation from urgency signals in speeded decision making. Journal of Neurophysiology, 114(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00088.2015[details]
Heathcote, A., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). An introduction to good practices in cognitive modeling. In B. U. Forstmann, & E-J. Wagenmakers (Eds.), An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience (pp. 25-48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_2[details]
Heck, D. W., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Morey, R. D. (2015). Testing order constraints: Qualitative differences between Bayes factors and normalized maximum likelihood. Statistics & Probability Letters, 105, 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2015.06.014[details]
Krypotos, A-M., Beckers, T., Kindt, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). A Bayesian hierarchical diffusion model decomposition of performance in approach-avoidance tasks. Cognition & Emotion, 29(8), 1424-1444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.985635[details]
Lee, M. D., Lodewyckx, T., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Three Bayesian analyses of memory deficits in patients with dissociative identity disorder. In J. G. W. Raaijmakers, A. H. Criss, R. L. Goldstone, R. M. Nosofsky, & M. Steyvers (Eds.), Cognitive modeling in perception and memory: a festschrift for Richard M. Shiffrin (pp. 189-200). (Psychology Press festschrifts). New York/London: Psychology Press. [details]
Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., Batchelder, W. H., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Bayesian estimation of multinomial processing tree models with heterogeneity in participants and items. Psychometrika, 80(1), 205-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9374-9[details]
Matzke, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., van Rijn, H., Slagter, H. A., van der Molen, M. W., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). The effect of horizontal eye movements on free recall: A preregistered adversarial collaboration. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 144(1), e1-e15. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000038[details]
Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E-J., & van Rijn, H. (2015). On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(1), 1-17. [details]
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., ... Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422-1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374[details]
Nuijten, M. B., Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for mediation. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0470-2[details]
Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Koch, G., van Aalst, C., Pinto, Y., Matzke, D., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). On the automatic link between affect and tendencies to approach and avoid: Chen and Bargh (1999) revisited. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, [335]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00335[details]
Steingroever, H., Fridberg, D., Horstmann, A., Kjome, K., Kumari, V., Lane, S. D., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Data from 617 healthy participants performing the Iowa gambling task: A "many labs" collaboration. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 3(1), [e5]. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.ak[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). ŵ=.2, â=.8, ĉ=.6: So what? On the meaning of parameter estimates from reinforcement-learning models. Decision, 2(3), 228-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000034[details]
Terry, A., Marley, A. A. J., Barnwal, A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Heathcote, A., & Brown, S. D. (2015). Generalising the drift rate distribution for linear ballistic accumulators. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 68-69, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.09.002[details]
Vandekerckhove, J., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Model comparison and the principle of parsimony. In J. R. Busemeyer, Z. Wang, J. T. Townsend, & A. Eidels (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology (pp. 300-319). (Oxford library of psychology). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199957996.013.14[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Beek, T. F., Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Sasiadek, A., Gronau, Q. F., Love, J., & Pinto, Y. (2015). Turning the hands of time again: a purely confirmatory replication study and a Bayesian analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, [494]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00494[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Verhagen, J., Ly, A., Bakker, M., Lee, M. D., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2015). A power fallacy. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 913-917. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0517-4[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., Kievit, R. A., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2015). A skeptical eye on psi. In E. C. May, & S. B. Marwaha (Eds.), Extrasensory perception: Support, skepticism, and science (pp. 153-176). Praeger. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/syq2h[details]
van Elk, M., Matzke, D., Gronau, Q. F., Guan, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, [1365]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01365[details]
Heathcote, A., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Brown, S. D. (2014). The falsifiability of actual decision-making models. Psychological Review, 121(4), 676-678. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037771[details]
Hoekstra, R., Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1157-1164. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3[details]
Logan, G. D., van Zandt, T., Verbruggen, F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: General and special theories of an act of control. Psychological Review, 121(1), 66-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035230[details]
Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Simple relation between Bayesian order-restricted and point-null hypothesis tests. Statistics & Probability Letters, 92, 121-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2014.05.010[details]
Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: A comment on Cumming (2014). Psychological Science, 25(6), 1289-1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614525969[details]
Munafò, M., Noble, S., Browne, W. J., Brunner, D., Button, K., Ferreira, J., ... Blumenstein, R. (2014). Scientific rigor and the art of motorcycle maintenance. Nature Biotechnology, 32(9), 871-873. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3004[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Absolute performance of reinforcement-learning models for the Iowa Gambling Task. Decision, 1(3), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000005[details]
Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Bayesian tests to quantify the result of a replication attempt. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(4), 1457-1475. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036731[details]
Winkel, J., Keuken, M. C., van Maanen, L., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Forstmann, B. U. (2014). Early evidence affects later decisions: Why evidence accumulation is required to explain response time data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 777-784. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0551-8[details]
Zhang, S., Lee, M. D., Vandekerckhove, J., Maris, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Time-varying boundaries for diffusion models of decision making and response time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, [1364]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01364[details]
de Groot, A. D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Borsboom, D., Verhagen, J., Kievit, R., Bakker, M., Cramer, A., Matzke, D., Mellenbergh, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2014). The meaning of "significance" for different types of research. Acta Psychologica, 148, 188-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001[details]
de Hollander, G., Wagenmakers, E-J., Waldorp, L., & Forstmann, B. (2014). An antidote to the imager's fallacy, or how to identify brain areas that are in limbo. PLoS ONE, 9(12), [e115700]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115700[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Boekel, W., Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Action video games do not improve the speed of information processing in simple perceptual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(5), 1794-1805. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036923[details]
2013
Dutilh, G., Forstmann, B., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). A diffusion model account of age differences in post-error slowing. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029875[details]
Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., Logan, G. D., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142(4), 1047-1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030543[details]
Matzke, D., Love, J., Wiecki, T. V., Brown, S. D., Logan, G. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Release the BEESTS: Bayesian Estimation of Ex-Gaussian STop-Signal reaction time distributions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, [918]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00918[details]
Mulder, M. J., Keuken, M. C., van Maanen, L., Boekel, W. E., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2013). The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75(5), 1048-1058. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0447-8[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). A comparison of reinforcement learning models for the Iowa Gambling Task using parameter space partitioning. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(2), 2. [2]. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1150[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Validating the PVL-Delta model for the Iowa gambling task. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, [898]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00898[details]
Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Horstmann, A., Neumann, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Performance of healthy participants on the Iowa Gambling Task. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029929[details]
Turner, B. M., Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E-J., Brown, S. D., Sederberg, P. B., & Steyvers, M. (2013). A Bayesian framework for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data. NeuroImage, 72, 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.048[details]
2012
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(2), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0243-2[details]
Dutilh, G., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., van der Maas, H. L. J., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). How to measure post-error slowing: A confound and a simple solution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(3), 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.04.001[details]
Dyjas, O., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wetzels, R., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). What's in a name: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis of the name-letter effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, [334]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00334[details]
Hawkins, G. E., Brown, S. D., Steyvers, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). An optimal adjustment procedure to minimize experiment time in decisions with multiple alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(2), 339-348. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0216-z[details]
Hawkins, G., Brown, S. D., Steyvers, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Context effects in multi-alternative decision making: Empirical data and a Bayesian model. Cognitive Science, 36(3), 498-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01221.x[details]
Hawkins, G., Brown, S. D., Steyvers, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Decision speed induces context effects in choice. Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000145[details]
Ho, T., Brown, S., van Maanen, L., Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Serences, J. T. (2012). The optimality of sensory processing during the speed-accuracy tradeoff. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(23), 7992-8003. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0340-12.2012[details]
Huizenga, H. M., Wetzels, R., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Four empirical tests of Unconscious Thought Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 332-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.010[details]
Mulder, M. J., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ratcliff, R., Boekel, W., & Forstmann, B. U. (2012). Bias in the brain: A diffusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payoff. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(7), 2335-2343. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4156-11.2012[details]
Ortega, A., Wagenmakers, E-J., Lee, M. D., Markowitsch, H. J., & Piefke, M. (2012). A Bayesian latent group analysis for detecting poor effort in the assessment of malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(4), 453-465. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs038[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Krypotos, A-M., Criss, A. H., & Iverson, G. (2012). On the interpretation of removable interactions: a survey of the field 33 years after Loftus. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0158-0[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Farrell, S. (2012). Abstract concepts require concrete models: Why cognitive scientists have not yet embraced nonlinearly coupled, dynamical, self-organized critical, synergistic, scale-free, exquisitely context-sensitive, interaction-dominant, multifractal, interdependent brain-body-niche systems. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01164.x[details]
Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1057-1064. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0295-x[details]
van Maanen, L., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Piéron's law and optimal behavior in perceptual decision-making. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, [143]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00143[details]
van Maanen, L., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Forstmann, B. U., Keuken, M. C., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Similarity and number of alternatives in the random-dot motion paradigm. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(4), 739-753. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0267-7[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Dutilh, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). A diffusion model decomposition of the effects of alcohol on perceptual decision making. Psychopharmacology, 219(4), 1017-1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2435-9[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Mulder, M. J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Do the dynamics of prior information depend on task context? An analysis of optimal performance and an empirical test. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, [132]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00132[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2012). Optimal decision making in neural inhibition models. Psychological Review, 119(1), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026275[details]
2011
Donkin, C., Brown, S., Heathcote, A., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0022-4[details]
Dutilh, G., Krypotos, A-M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice: a diffusion model account. Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 434-442. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000111[details]
Dutilh, G., Wagenmakers, E-J., Visser, I., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). A phase transition model for the speed-accuracy trade-off in response time experiments. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 211-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01147.x[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., Wagenmakers, E. J., Derrfuss, J., Imperati, D., & Brown, S. (2011). The speed-accuracy tradeoff in the elderly brain: a structural model-based approach. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(47), 17242-17249. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0309-11.2011[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E-J., Eichele, T., Brown, S., & Serences, J. T. (2011). Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: opposites attract? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(6), 272-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.002[details]
Lodewyckx, T., Kim, W., Lee, M. D., Tuerlinckx, F., Kuppens, P., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). A tutorial on Bayes factor estimation with the product space method. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(5), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2011.06.001[details]
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105-1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886[details]
Stringer, S., Borsboom, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Bayesian inference for the information gain model. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0057-5[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 426-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790[details]
Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: an empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406923[details]
van Maanen, L., Brown, S. D., Eichele, T., Wagenmakers, E-J., Ho, T., Serences, J., & Forstmann, B. U. (2011). Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(48), 17488-17495. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2924-11.2011[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Brown, S., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). An integrated perspective on the relation between response speed and intelligence. Cognition, 119(3), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.002[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Dutilh, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Cognitive model decomposition of the BART: assessment and application. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(1), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.010[details]
van Ravenzwaaij, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Does the Name-Race Implicit Association Test measure racial prejudice? Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000093[details]
2010
Bogacz, R., Wagenmakers, E. J., Forstmann, B. U., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2010). The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trends in Neurosciences, 33(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2009.09.002[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Anwander, A., Schäfer, A., Neumann, J., Brown, S., Wagenmakers, E. M., ... Turner, R. (2010). Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(36), 15916-15920. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004932107[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Brown, S., Dutilh, G., Neumann, J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). The neural substrate of prior information in perceptual decision making: a model-based analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, [40]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00040[details]
Heathcote, A., Brown, S., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Eidels, A. (2010). Distribution-free tests of stochastic dominance for small samples. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(5), 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.005[details]
Iverson, G. J., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). The random effects prep continues to mispredict the probability of replication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), 270-272. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.270[details]
Iverson, G. J., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Lee, M. D. (2010). A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of prep. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017182[details]
Jepma, M., te Beek, E. T., Wagenmakers, E-J., van Gerven, J. M. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2010). The role of the noradrenergic system in the exploration-exploitation trade-off: a psychopharmacological study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, [170]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00170[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method. Cognitive Psychology, 60(3), 158-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001[details]
Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). Exemplary introduction to Bayesian statistical inference [Review of: I. Ntzoufras (2009) Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(5), 466-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.02.002[details]
Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). An encompassing prior generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 54(9), 2094-2102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.03.016[details]
Wetzels, R., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). Bayesian inference using WBDev: a tutorial for social scientists. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 884-897. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.884[details]
Wetzels, R., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2010). Bayesian parameter estimation in the Expectancy Valence model of the Iowa gamblling task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.12.001[details]
2009
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(6), 1026-1036. https://doi.org/10.3758/16.6.1026[details]
Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wagenmakers, E-J., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2009). On the mean and variance of response times under the diffusion model with an application to parameter estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2009.01.006[details]
Grasman, R. P. P. P., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). Fitting the cusp catastrophe in R: a cusp-package primer. Journal of Statistical Software, 32(8), 1-28. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v32/i08/paper[details]
Iverson, G., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). prep misestimates the probability of replication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 424-429. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.424[details]
Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E-J., Band, G. P. H., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2009). The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(5), 847-864. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21063[details]
Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 798-817. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.798[details]
Steyvers, M., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). A Bayesian analysis of human decision-making on bandit problems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(3), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.11.002[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 641-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802205067[details]
Wetzels, R., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Jakab, E., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: a flexible winBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t-test. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 752-760. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.752[details]
2008
Ahn, W-Y., Busemeyer, J. R., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Stout, J. C. (2008). Comparison of decision learning models using the generalization criterion method. Cognitive Science, 32, 1376-1402. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802352992[details]
Forstmann, B. U., Dutilh, G., Brown, S., Neumann, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2008). Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(45), 17538-17542. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805903105[details]
Shiffrin, R. M., Lee, M. D., Kim, W., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248-1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802414826[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(1), 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.006[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2008). EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1229-1235. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1229[details]
2022
Maier, M., Bartoš, F., & Wagenmakers, E. M. (2022). Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis: Addressing Publication Bias with Model-Averaging. (v5 ed.) PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u4cns
Maier, M., Bartoš, F., Stanley, T. D., Shanks, D. R., Harris, A. J. L., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2022). No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(31), [e2200300119]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200300119[details]
Shiffrin, R. M., Matzke, D., Crystal, J. D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Chandramouli, S. H., Vandekerckhove, J., Zorzi, M., Morey, R. D., & Murphy, M. C. (2021). Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion. Learning and Behavior, 49(3), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-021-00474-5[details]
Verschuere, B., De Schryver, M., van den Bergh, D., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Meijer, E. (2021). Are dishonest politicians more likely to be reelected? A Bayesian view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(6), [e2022718118]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022718118[details]
Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A., Wagenmakers, E-J., Klugkist, I. G., Rouder, J. N., Vandekerckhove, J., Lee, M. D., Morey, R. D., Vanpaemel, W., Dienes, Z., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 561–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z[details]
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., Chambers, C. D., Fisher, A., Gelman, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., Ioannidis, J. P., Johnson, E., Jonas, K., Kousta, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., Lindsay, D. S., Morey, C. C., Munafò, M., Newell, B. R., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6[details]
Bartoš, F., Maier, M., & Wagenmakers, E. M. (2020). Adjusting for Publication Bias in JASP — Selection Models and Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/75bqn
Forscher, P. S., Wagenmakers, E. M., Coles, N. A., Silan, M. A., Dutra, N., Basnight-Brown, D., & IJzerman, H. (2020). A Manifesto for Big Team Science. (PsyArXiv). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2mdxh
Heck, D. W., Böhm, U., Böing-Messing, F., Bürkner, P-C., Derks, K., Dienes, Z., Fu, Q., Gu, X., Karimova, D., Kiers, H. A. L., Klugkist, I., Kuiper, R., Lee, M. D., Leenders, R., Leplaa, H. J., Linde, M., Ly, A., Meijerink-Bosman, M., Moerbeek, M., ... Hoijtink, H. (2020). A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research. (PsyArXiv). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cu43g
Hulme, O. J., Wagenmakers, E. M., Damkier, P., Madelung, C. F., Siebner, H. R., Helweg-Larsen, J., Gronau, Q. F., Benfield, T., & Madsen, K. H. (2020). Reply to Gautret et al. 2020: A Bayesian reanalysis of the effects of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on viral carriage in patients with COVID-19. PLoS ONE.
Hutton, J. L., Diggle, P. J., Bird, S. M., Hennig, C., Longford, N., Mathur, M. B., Vander Weele, T. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Chai, C. P., Dowe, D. L., Ferguson, J., Fitz-Simon, N., Friede, T., Rover, C., Grieve, A. P., Kumar, K., Ly, A., Mansmann, U., Mateu, J., ... Held, L. (2020). Discussion on the meeting on ‘Signs and sizes: understanding and replicating statistical findings’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 183(2), 449-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12544[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2020). Statistical dark arts endanger democracy — and life: Two scourges of the infodemic show how to spot quantitative chicanery. [Review of: C.T. Bergstrom, J.D. West (2020) Calling Bullshit: The Art of Scepticism in a Data‑Driven World]. Nature, 584(7819), 36. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02280-x[details]
van Dongen, N. N. N., Wagenmakers, E. M., & Sprenger, J. (2020). A Bayesian Perspective on Severity: Risky Predictions and Specific Hypotheses. (PsyArXiv). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4et65
Wagenmakers, E. M., Gronau, Q. F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). Five Bayesian Intuitions for the Stopping Rule Principle. (PsyArXiv). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5ntkd
2018
Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., Cesarini, D., Chambers, C. D., Clyde, M., Cook, T. D., De Boeck, P., Dienes, Z., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C., ... Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
2017
Keuken, M. C., Ly, A., Boekel, W., Wagenmakers, E-M., Belay, L., Verhagen, J., Brown, S. D., & Forstmann, B. U. (2017). Corrigendum to “A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations” [Cortex 66 (2015) 115–133]. Cortex, 93, 229-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.03.007[details]
Morey, R. D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). Continued misinterpretation of confidence intervals: Response to Miller and Ulrich. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0955-8[details]
Bakker, M., Cramer, A. O. J., Matzke, D., Kievit, R. A., van der Maas, H. L. J., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Dwelling on the past. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 120-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1920[details]
Bakker, M., Wagenmakers, E-J., Borsboom, D., Wicherts, J., & van der Maas, H. (2013). Spelregels in de psychologie: over eerlijk en goed onderzoek. De Psycholoog, 48(12), 68-76. [details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Sjoemelwetenschap. De Psycholoog, 48(4), 34-35. [details]
2011
Borsboom, D., Wagenmakers, E-J., & Romeijn, J-W. (2011). Mechanistic curiosity will not kill the Bayesian cat. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(4), 192-193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000215[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2011). Kleren voor de keizer [Bespreking van: R. van de Schoot (2010) Informative hypotheses: how to move beyond classical null hypothesis testing]. De Psycholoog, 46(1), 21-22. [details]
2009
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2009). How do individuals reason in the Wason card selection task [Review of: M. Oaksford, N. Chater (2007) Bayesian rationality: the probabilistic approach to human reasoning]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(1), 104-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000508[details]
2008
Wagenmakers, E-J., Lee, M. D., Lodewyckx, T., & Iverson, G. (2008). Bayesian versus frequentist inference. In H. Hoijtink, I. Klugkist, & P. A. Boelen (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (pp. 181-207). (Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09612-4_9[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Prins op een missie: [Boekbespreking van: C. Chambers (2018) De 7 doodzonden van de psychologie: pleidooi voor een cultuuromslag in de wetenschappelijke praktijk]. De Psycholoog, 54(3), 28-29. https://osf.io/uvw83/[details]
2016
Wagenmakers, E-J. (2016). [Review of: R.B. Kline (2013) Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences]. American Statistician, 70(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1185863[details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., & Dutilh, G. (2016). Preregistration: Why, what, where? Psychology Research Institute of the University of Amsterdam.
Borsboom, D., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2013). Derailed: the rise and fall of Diederik Stapel [Review of: D. Stapel (2012) Ontsporing]. APS Observer, 26(1). [details]
Wagenmakers, E-J., & van der Maas, H. (2008). [Review of: A.R. Jensen (2006) Clocking the mind: mental chronometry and individual differences]. Intelligence, 36(5), 493-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.09.001[details]
Wagenmakers, E. M., & Pecher, D. (2020). KoppenEnStaarten2020. Skepter, 33(4), 16-20.
2017
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). Het zwaard van Alhazen. Skepter, 30, 34-35.
2011
Borsboom, D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Kievit, R. A., Wetzels, R., van den Berg, H., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011). Universiteiten en subsidieverstrekkers moeten fraude aanpakken. De Volkskrant.
Kievit, R. A., Borsboom, D., Wagenmakers, E-J., Wicherts, J. M., Wetzels, R., van Harmelen, A-L., & van den Berg, H. (2011). Maatregel om fraude te bemoeilijken brengt enkel voordelen met zich mee. De Volkskrant.
2017
Ly, A., Raj, A., Wagenmakers, E. M., & Marsman, M. (2017). A limit-consistent Bayes factor for testing the equality of two Poisson rates. Poster session presented at International Workshop on Objective Bayes Methodology, Austin, United States.
2015
Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). Jeffrey's Correlation Test Based on Criteria of Bayarri, Berger, Forte, and Garcia-Donato (2012). Poster session presented at 11th International Workshop on Objective Bayes Methodology.
Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. M. (2015). Jeffreys’s Correlation Test Based on Criteria of Bayarri, Berger, Forte, and Garcia-Donato (2012). Poster session presented at Objective Bayesian Analysis, Valencia, Spain.
Prize / grant
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2018). Verbindingsprijs.
Wagenmakers, E. M. & Stefan, A. M. (2018). MaGW research talent (NWO).
Wagenmakers, E. M. & Kucharsky, S. (2018). MaGW research talent (NWO).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). Advanced Grant from the European Research Council (ERC).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). VICI grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). PhD grant from NWO.
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Dynamic adjustment of response caution in perceptual decision-making..
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Partner investigator on the Australian Research Council three-year project "Rapid Decisions: From Neuroscience to Complex Cognitions".
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Partner investigator on the Australian Research Council three-year project "Cognitive Flexibility from Adolescence to Senescence: Variability Associated with Cognitive Strategy and Brain Connectivity"..
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Inaugural recipient of the Newcastle Psychology Research Visitor Fellowship..
Membership / relevant position
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). Member of the committee on Replication Research (“Replicatieonderzoek”) organized by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), KNAW.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2017). Member of Advisory Board, PsychFileDrawer.org project.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (2016-2017). Member of the committee on Replication Research (“Replicatieonderzoek”) organized by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), (…), KNAW.
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2010). Keynote: Bayesian model selection in sensometrics., the 10th Conference on Sensometrics, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, July 2010..
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2010). Subsidie: The "ALW open competition" postdoc project "The neural basis of decision-making with multiple choice alternatives" was awarded a three-year (…), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (15-10-2018). Bayesian inference without tears, Centre International de Rencontres Mathematiques (CIRM).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (1-9-2018). Bayesian advantages for the pragmatic researcher, Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Frankfurt.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (30-4-2018). Tip of the iceberg? Revealing hidden uncertainty in cognitive modeling, h-MPT Network Meeting, Mannheim.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (20-4-2018). Bayesian inference with JASP, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience NIN - KNAW.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (10-4-2018). The case for radical transparency in statistical reporting, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (1-4-2018). Bayesian statistics using JASP, VU, Amsterdam.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (20-1-2018). The case for radical transparency in statistical reporting., Replication and Reproducibility Event II: Moving Psychological Science Forward , Londen.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (12-2017). Barbecue chicken alert!, BITTS.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (11-2017). An introduction to JASP, Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam (ONWAR) .
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (11-2017). Hidden pseudoscience: Ailment, diagnosis, and cure, Amsterdam Skeptics in the Pub.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (10-2017). The case for radical transparency in statistical reporting, ASA, American Sociological Association.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (10-2017). The why and how of testing a point-null hypothesis within a Bayesian framework, TU Delft.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (10-2017). Redefine statistical significance with JASP, IMC.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (9-2017). JASP/Evidence, BITTS.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (9-2017). “JASP Training Course”, 20th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCoP).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (9-2017). Bayesian statistics without tears, Oxford University.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (6-2017). The maximum diagnosticity of the p-value, workshop “Is there a future without null hypothesis significance testing?”.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (6-2017). History and statistical foundation of preregistration, Tilburg University.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (5-2017). “Bayesian Inference with JASP: A Fresh Way to Do Statistics", 29th Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (4-2017). “JASP: A Fresh Way to do Statistics”, BBSRC STARS Course “Advanced Methods for Reproducible Science”.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (3-2017). “Bayesian Inference in Theory and Practice: A JASP Workshop”, Philips Research.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (2-2017). “A personal perspective on the analysis of neuroscience data”, 6th Berlin Winter School on Ethics and Neuroscience.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (2017). The methodological metamorphosis of neuroscience, 6th Berlin Winter School on Ethics and Neuroscience.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (2017). KNAW report: Replication studies, NAS.
Wagenmakers, E. M. (speaker) (2017). “Bayesian analysis with JASP: A fresh way to do statistics”, Max Planck School for Language Sciences.
Others
van Doorn, J. (organiser), Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser) & Sarafoglou, A. (organiser) (26-8-2019 - 30-8-2019). Ninth Annual JAGS and WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
van Doorn, J. (organiser), Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Sarafoglou, A. (organiser) & Morey, R. D. (organiser) (22-8-2019 - 23-8-2019). Theory and Practice of Bayesian Hypothesis Testing (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Matzke, D. (organiser), Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser) & Tuerlinckx, F. (organiser) (25-3-2019 - 29-3-2019). Erasmus Seminar on Mathematical Psychology: “Formal Models and Quantitative Methods for Psychology” (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Lee, M. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser) & Gronau, Q. F. (organiser) (20-8-2018 - 24-8-2018). Eight Annual JAGS and WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Gronau, Q. F. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser) & Matzke, D. (organiser) (28-8-2017 - 29-8-2017). Theory and Practice of Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: A JASP Workshop (organising a conference, workshop, ...). http://(https://jasp- stats.org/upcoming-events/jasp-workshop/
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser), Gronau, Q. F. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser) & Lee, M. (organiser) (21-8-2017 - 25-8-2017). Seventh Annual JAGS and WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...). http://bayescourse.socsci.uva.nl/index.php?src=hom e
Wagenmakers, E. M. (participant) (2017). Fellow for the Association for Psychological Science (other).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (consultant) (2017). Statistical consulting, CHDI Foundation (consultancy).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Selker, R. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser) & Ly, A. (organiser) (2016). Theory and Practice of Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: A JASP Workshop (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Selker, R. (organiser), van Doorn, J. B. (organiser), Steingröver, H. M. (organiser), Lee, M. (organiser) & Ly, A. (organiser) (2016). Sixth Annual JAGS and WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Tuerlinckx, F. (organiser) & Matzke, D. (organiser) (22-3-2015 - 28-3-2015). Erasmus-IP Seminar on Mathematical Psychology, Debrecen. Formal Models and Quantitative Methods for Psychology. (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser) & Ly, A. (organiser) (2015). First Annual JASP Workhop: A Fresh Way to do Bayesian Statistics., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Lee, M. D. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser) & Matzke, D. (organiser) (2015). Fifth Annual WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Lee, M. D. (organiser), Ly, A. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Steingroever, H. (organiser) & Verhagen, A. J. (organiser) (11-8-2014 - 15-8-2014). Fourth Annual WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Steingröver, H. M. (organiser) & Ly, A. (organiser) (12-8-2013 - 16-8-2013). WinBUGS Workshop: Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser), Steingröver, H. M. (organiser) & Lee, M. (organiser) (2-7-2012 - 6-7-2012). Organisation of the workshop "Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science"., Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (organiser) & Forstmann, B. U. (organiser) (2012). Organisation of the Academy Colloquium "New Insights from Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience", Amsterdam (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
Wagenmakers, E. M. (organiser), Wetzels, R. M. (organiser), Matzke, D. (organiser) & Lee, M. (organiser) (22-8-2011). Bayesian Modeling for Cognitive Science (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
2017
Steingröver, H. M. (2017). Safe models for risky decisions. [details]
Haaf, J. M., Hoogeveen, S., Berkhout, S., Gronau, Q. F., & Wagenmakers, E. M. (2020). A Bayesian Multiverse Analysis of Many Labs 4: Quantifying the Evidence against Mortality Salience. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cb9er
Wagenmakers, E. M., & Gronau, Q. F. (2020). Overwhelming Evidence for Vaccine Efficacy in the Pfizer Trial: An Interim Bayesian Analysis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fs562
2019
Evans, N. J., Tillman, G., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2019). Systematic and random sources of variability in perceptual decision-making: Comment on Ratcliff, Voskuilen, and McKoon (2018). (Version 1 ed.) PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/j98qd[details]
de Jonge, P., Morey, R., Roest, A. M., Wardenaar, K. J., Monden, R., Wagenmakers, E.-J. & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (1-8-2018). Data for: The comparative evidence basis for the efficacy of second-generation antidepressants in the treatment of depression: A Bayesian Meta-analysis. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/p3k5h38xpn.1
2015
Tio, P., Renkewitz, F., Bell, R., Selterman, D., Thomas, S. L., Martinez, T., Voracek, M., Van Doorn, J., Ostkamp, L., Galak, J., Pipitone, R. ., Epskamp, S., Hodsoll, J., Axt, J., Van Rijn, H., Bartmess, E., Strohminger, N., Beyan, L., Hung, C. O.-Y., … Scholz, S. (1-1-2015). Data from: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Singapore Management University. https://doi.org/10.25440/smu.12062757.v1
The UvA website uses cookies and similar technologies to ensure the basic functionality of the site and for statistical and optimisation purposes. It also uses cookies to display content such as YouTube videos and for marketing purposes. This last category consists of tracking cookies: these make it possible for your online behaviour to be tracked. You consent to this by clicking on Accept. Also read our Privacy statement
Necessary
Cookies that are essential for the basic functioning of the website. These cookies are used to enable students and staff to log in to the site, for example.
Necessary & Optimalisation
Cookies that collect information about visitor behaviour anonymously to help make the website work more effectively.
Necessary & Optimalisation & Marketing
Cookies that make it possible to track visitors and show them personalised adverts. These are used by third-party advertisers to gather data about online behaviour. To watch Youtube videos you need to enable this category.